Schaeffer & Lamere, P.C.

     

        

 

   HOME

 

 Published 5/27/97

 

 

 The St. Louis 

     Post-Dispatch

 

 

 Op-Ed Page


 

 

 

The Virtues of Eccentricity

        By T. Evan Schaeffer

        In his recent Playboy interview, novelist Saul Bellow leaps off the page as a cantankerous old brute, a crotchety octogenarian. He sneers at the state of American society, damns other big-name authors with faint praise, grumbles and bellyaches about any number of things.

        You have to like the guy. A survivor for decades, the winner of every major literary award, Bellow has earned the right to be bad-tempered. At a time when any number of forces are working to create a homogenous American, it’s refreshing to stumble across a true eccentric.

        Eccentrics are in short supply. Attempting to create a uniqueness of personality is difficult when we feel compelled to choose our identities from among the images served up by TV executives and corporate advertisers, and when, as Bellow points out, we learn how to conduct our lives from such banal handbooks as Esquire and Cosmopolitan magazines. Although everyone possesses the creative energy necessary to develop a unique personality, this energy is often used not to offend, not to appear different, to fit into the familiar mold of the late-20th-century middle class American.

        As applied to personality, the term "eccentricity" echoes its scientific use of describing a planetary orbit that is slightly off-center. Although an eccentric’s off-centerness can be expressed as a simple over-exuberance of personality, it is always natural and unforced.

        Excluded from the ranks of the eccentrics are those whose quirks have been consciously adopted as marketing ploys—Howard Stern, say, or Dennis Rodham. Also excluded are those whose off-centerness expresses itself in criminality—alleged wrong-doers Timothy McVeigh or Theodore Kaczinski.

        Sometimes eccentrics turn up where you least expect them. For the past six years, I worked as an associate at a large St. Louis law firm that is frequently in the news. While being groomed for partnership, the firm’s young lawyers had to suppress their natural quirks of character. But once admitted into the partnership and freed of the shackles that had confined them to the role of kiss-up junior associates, these lawyers would allow their quirks to blossom into bouquets of lunacy.

        Among the rank of partner, eccentricity was always the rule, never the exception. There were partners who balked at the inconvenience of wearing a suit and tie, and so went casual (or just plain sloppy); partners whose giant brains needed so much nourishment that they’d unthinkingly devour the secretaries’ refrigerated lunches; partners who were simply very loud.

        Perhaps odd, certainly different, but not inherently evil. Eccentricity, after all, is a first cousin to originality; this being so, the eccentricity present in the law firm’s partnership bred new ways of thinking that allowed the firm to become one of the largest and most successful in the region.

        Ultimately, however, even the eccentricity of my former bosses was restricted by the basically conservative nature of the law business. This illustrates another facet of true eccentricity. It comprises not only a haphazard bundle of personal quirks but also a unique and unfettered way of looking at the world.

        It is at this point that society stands opposed to eccentricity. To be different is to threaten the status quo; thus eccentrics are a barrier to any group that proselytizes a system of belief. Some examples of such groups are obvious—the religious right, political conservatives; others are not so obvious—corporate advertisers, Hollywood movie producers.

        Of course, eccentrics are a quiet bunch, never openly seditious, and most often go unnoticed. Society’s attitude towards its eccentrics can be just as understated, expressed as a generalized but unspoken disdain for anyone outside the group. It is only when eccentrics happen into the limelight that the fireworks begin. Congress rescinds its funding for "subversive" artists; a group of isolationists is burned at Waco; Kurt Cobain feels compelled to give it up.

        John Stuart Mill wrote that the amount of eccentricity in a society increases in proportion to the amount of genius, mental vigor and moral courage it contains. These days, when the chill winds of conformity drive many eccentrics underground, Mill’s formula must be revised to recognize that eccentricity also decreases in proportion to the negative energy a society exerts to stomp it out.

        This is why the Saul Bellow interview is so refreshing. The presence of eccentrics in our midst is proof that our society is free. At a time when there’s too much sameness in our corner of the world, we should encourage our fellow eccentrics and nurture the eccentricities in ourselves.


Back